Strict Scrutiny Continuing Legal Education: Supreme Court 2025-2026 Term Recap

Constitutional law professors, and hosts of the Strict Scrutiny podcast, Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray, recap the 2025–2026 Supreme Court term. They break down the biggest cases, highlight overarching themes in the opinions and dissents, and dig into what it all means for the future of the Court, the country, and our daily lives.

How do I redeem my course & certificate of completion for each state? 

Upon purchase you will be sent a receipt email with a link to access your course via Lawline.

Cases covered include: Louisiana v. Callais, Mullin v. Doe, Trump v. Slaughter, Trump v. Cook, Trump v. Barbara, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, West Virginia v. B.P.J., Little v. Hecox, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, and more.

Course Length: 60 minutes 

State Eligibility Details: Not all states qualify at this time. Check eligibility before purchase.

• Approved: California, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Washington, Oregon, Texas
• Pending: No other states available at this time! If you'd like to see the state for your bar license added to the approved list above, send us an email to strictscrutiny@crooked.com .

This program is sponsored by Lawline, an accredited CLE provider responsible for CLE administration. For questions or assistance with CLE credit, our support team is here to help.

Email us at support@lawline.com or call us at 218-278-3570.

The opinions or viewpoints expressed by the faculty members do not necessarily reflect those of Lawline. These materials were prepared by the faculty members who are solely responsible for their correctness and appropriateness.

This publication is designed to provide general information on the seminar topic presented. It is presented with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services. Although this manual is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.